Filed: Jul. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 11, 2012 No. 11-70004 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk CARLOS MANUEL AYESTAS, also known as Dennis Zelaya Corea, Petitioner-Appellant v. RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CV-2999 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circu
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 11, 2012 No. 11-70004 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk CARLOS MANUEL AYESTAS, also known as Dennis Zelaya Corea, Petitioner-Appellant v. RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CV-2999 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circui..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
July 11, 2012
No. 11-70004 Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
CARLOS MANUEL AYESTAS, also known as Dennis Zelaya Corea,
Petitioner-Appellant
v.
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:09-CV-2999
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Petitioner has also moved that this court vacate its prior opinion and
remand to the district court for consideration of his previously made claim of
ineffective assistance of state habeas counsel in light of the Supreme Court’s
decision in Martinez v. Ryan,
132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012). This court recently
addressed Martinez’s applicability in Texas. See Ibarra v. Thaler, No. 11-70031,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 11-70004
2012 WL 2620520, at *4 (5th Cir. June 28, 2012). We held that, because Texas
does not mandate ineffective assistance claims to be brought first in habeas
proceedings, Martinez does not apply in Texas. Id. Accordingly, we DENY the
motion.
2