Case: 12-30050     Document: 00511873692         Page: 1     Date Filed: 06/01/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                            June 1, 2012
                                     No. 12-30050
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MALCOLM SCOTT GUILLORY,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Louisiana
                           USDC No. 2:05-CR-20142-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Malcolm Scott
Guillory has moved for leave to withdraw in Guillory’s appeal of the district
court’s order granting his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and has filed a
brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

 (1967), and United
States v. Flores, 

 (5th Cir. 2011). Guillory has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 12-30050   Document: 00511873692     Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/01/2012

                                No. 12-30050

no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2