Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. David Frank, 12-30189 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-30189 Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-30189 Document: 00511970701 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/27/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 27, 2012 No. 12-30189 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DAVID JEROME FRANK, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:03-CR-20067-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. P
More
     Case: 12-30189     Document: 00511970701         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/27/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 27, 2012
                                     No. 12-30189
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID JEROME FRANK,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Louisiana
                           USDC No. 2:03-CR-20067-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Jerome Frank
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
 (5th
Cir. 2011). Frank has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Frank’s response. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue
for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer