Case: 12-30217     Document: 00511978415         Page: 1     Date Filed: 09/07/2012




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        September 7, 2012
                                     No. 12-30217
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

HOWARD RONALD GUILLORY, SR.,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Louisiana
                           USDC No. 2:06-CR-20098-2


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Howard Guillory, Sr.,
federal prisoner # 13405-035, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

 (1967), and United
States v. Flores, 

 (5th Cir. 2011). Guillory has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents
no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
  Case: 12-30217   Document: 00511978415     Page: 2   Date Filed: 09/07/2012

                                No. 12-30217

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2