Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-40146 Document: 00511964336 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 21, 2012 No. 12-40146 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OCTAVIO LOPEZ-RAMOS, also known as Jose Angel Barrera-Valenzuela, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-1385-1 Before SMITH,
Summary: Case: 12-40146 Document: 00511964336 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 21, 2012 No. 12-40146 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. OCTAVIO LOPEZ-RAMOS, also known as Jose Angel Barrera-Valenzuela, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:10-CR-1385-1 Before SMITH, E..
More
Case: 12-40146 Document: 00511964336 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 21, 2012
No. 12-40146
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
OCTAVIO LOPEZ-RAMOS, also known as Jose Angel Barrera-Valenzuela,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:10-CR-1385-1
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Octavio Lopez-Ramos raises
an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586
F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which reaffirmed the holding in United States
v. Gamez-Gonzalez,
319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir. 2003), that knowledge of drug
type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The
appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.