Frederick Fermin v. United States, 12-50750 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 12-50750
Visitors: 37
Filed: Nov. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-50750 Document: 00512038566 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 31, 2012 No. 12-50750 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk FREDERICK C. FERMIN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant–Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CV-284 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER C
Summary: Case: 12-50750 Document: 00512038566 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 31, 2012 No. 12-50750 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk FREDERICK C. FERMIN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant–Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CV-284 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CU..
More
Case: 12-50750 Document: 00512038566 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 31, 2012 No. 12-50750 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk FREDERICK C. FERMIN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant–Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CV-284 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The District Court’s Memorandum Decision sets forth the facts of this case and its procedural history, including Appellant’s history of initiating abusive litigation. The court has carefully considered this appeal, and we find no reversible error of fact or law. We GRANT Appellee’s Motion for Summary Affirmance. We DENY Appellant’s Motion to Expedite Appeal as moot. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
