Filed: Jan. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-50751 Document: 00512107454 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 9, 2013 No. 11-50751 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk EDGAR WENCEL RUIZ-VILLALOBOS, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, RCDC III; BUREAU OF PRISONS; GEO GROUP, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 4:11-CV-20 Befor
Summary: Case: 11-50751 Document: 00512107454 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 9, 2013 No. 11-50751 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk EDGAR WENCEL RUIZ-VILLALOBOS, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, RCDC III; BUREAU OF PRISONS; GEO GROUP, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 4:11-CV-20 Before..
More
Case: 11-50751 Document: 00512107454 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
January 9, 2013
No. 11-50751
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
EDGAR WENCEL RUIZ-VILLALOBOS,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, RCDC III;
BUREAU OF PRISONS; GEO GROUP,
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
No. 4:11-CV-20
Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Edgar Ruiz-Villalobos, former federal prisoner # 58225-279, appeals the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-50751 Document: 00512107454 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/09/2013
No. 11-50751
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his exclusion from rehabili-
tation programs and halfway houses. Because he has been released from the
custody of the Bureau of Prisons, respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal as
moot is GRANTED. See Calderon v. Moore,
518 U.S. 149, 150 (1996). Respon-
dents’ alternative motion for an extension of time to file their brief is DENIED
as unnecessary.
The appeal is DISMISSED.
2