Filed: Apr. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10362 Document: 00512215656 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/22/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 22, 2013 No. 12-10362 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOE LUIS CARLOS ARCHULETA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-70-1 Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: Case: 12-10362 Document: 00512215656 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/22/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 22, 2013 No. 12-10362 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOE LUIS CARLOS ARCHULETA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-70-1 Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
Case: 12-10362 Document: 00512215656 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/22/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 22, 2013
No. 12-10362
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOE LUIS CARLOS ARCHULETA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:06-CR-70-1
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joe Luis Carlos
Archuleta has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Archuleta has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue
for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.