Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10852 Document: 00512277644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-10852 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MICHAEL VAN DAVIS, II, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-41-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 12-10852 Document: 00512277644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-10852 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MICHAEL VAN DAVIS, II, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-41-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* T..
More
Case: 12-10852 Document: 00512277644 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 18, 2013
No. 12-10852
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MICHAEL VAN DAVIS, II,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:11-CR-41-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Van Davis,
II, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Davis has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-10852 Document: 00512277644 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
No. 12-10852
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2