Filed: May 01, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10878 Document: 00512225079 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 30, 2013 No. 12-10878 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ROBERT V. MCLENNAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KERRI VEITCH, and John Doe Veitch, in her official and individual capacity; LARRY GARRETT, and Jane Doe Garrett, in his official and individual capacity; LARRY DAVIS, and Jane Doe Davis, in his official and indivi
Summary: Case: 12-10878 Document: 00512225079 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 30, 2013 No. 12-10878 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ROBERT V. MCLENNAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KERRI VEITCH, and John Doe Veitch, in her official and individual capacity; LARRY GARRETT, and Jane Doe Garrett, in his official and individual capacity; LARRY DAVIS, and Jane Doe Davis, in his official and individ..
More
Case: 12-10878 Document: 00512225079 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 30, 2013 No. 12-10878 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ROBERT V. MCLENNAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KERRI VEITCH, and John Doe Veitch, in her official and individual capacity; LARRY GARRETT, and Jane Doe Garrett, in his official and individual capacity; LARRY DAVIS, and Jane Doe Davis, in his official and individual capacity; RANDLE EFFLANDT, and Jane Doe Efflandlt, in his official and individual capacity; REGGIE BONNER, and Jane Doe Bonner, in his official and individual capacity; KELLY MCNAIR, and Jane Doe McNair, in his official and individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CV-531 Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM* AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Rule 47.6. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
