Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Justin McAdoo, 12-11011 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-11011 Visitors: 31
Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-11011 Document: 00512347057 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-11011 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUSTIN D. MCADOO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:09-CR-14-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
More
     Case: 12-11011       Document: 00512347057         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/20/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 20, 2013
                                     No. 12-11011
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUSTIN D. MCADOO,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:09-CR-14-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Justin D. McAdoo has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
 (5th
Cir. 2011). McAdoo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-11011   Document: 00512347057   Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/20/2013

                              No. 12-11011

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer