Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-11024 Document: 00512347092 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-11024 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIRNA OROZCO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-77-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 12-11024 Document: 00512347092 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-11024 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MIRNA OROZCO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-77-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* ..
More
Case: 12-11024 Document: 00512347092 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2013
No. 12-11024
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MIRNA OROZCO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-77-2
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Mirna Orozco has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Orozco has
not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions
of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.