Filed: Jun. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-20350 Document: 00512273017 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 13, 2013 No. 12-20350 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EVARISTO ROJAS GUZMAN, also known as Guerro, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CR-638-1 Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circ
Summary: Case: 12-20350 Document: 00512273017 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 13, 2013 No. 12-20350 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EVARISTO ROJAS GUZMAN, also known as Guerro, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CR-638-1 Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circu..
More
Case: 12-20350 Document: 00512273017 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 13, 2013
No. 12-20350
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EVARISTO ROJAS GUZMAN, also known as Guerro,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:10-CR-638-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Evaristo Rojas Guzman has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Guzman has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Guzman’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.