Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-20644 Document: 00512277501 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-20644 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANKLIN PERALTA MARTINEZ, also known as Franklin Peralta, also known as Franklin Peralta-Martinez, also known as Franklin Martinez Peralta, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court
Summary: Case: 12-20644 Document: 00512277501 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2013 No. 12-20644 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANKLIN PERALTA MARTINEZ, also known as Franklin Peralta, also known as Franklin Peralta-Martinez, also known as Franklin Martinez Peralta, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court f..
More
Case: 12-20644 Document: 00512277501 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 18, 2013
No. 12-20644
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FRANKLIN PERALTA MARTINEZ, also known as Franklin Peralta, also
known as Franklin Peralta-Martinez, also known as Franklin Martinez Peralta,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-144-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Franklin Peralta
Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Peralta Martinez has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-20644 Document: 00512277501 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
No. 12-20644
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2