Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Melvin Keel, Jr. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated, 12-40937 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-40937 Visitors: 53
Filed: Oct. 15, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-40937 Document: 00512406923 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 15, 2013 No. 12-40937 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk MELVIN C. KEEL, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant v. WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CV-248 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM
More
Case: 12-40937 Document: 00512406923 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 15, 2013 No. 12-40937 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk MELVIN C. KEEL, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant v. WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CV-248 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reason, as the magistrate judge has explained in careful detail, the plaintiff has failed to present evidence to raise a fact issue to support his complaints. The plaintiff has not pointed to any legal error in the ruling of the magistrate judge or judgment of the district judge. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer