Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-41202 Document: 00512346918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-41202 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ROBERTO RAMIREZ-MATA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-246-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges
Summary: Case: 12-41202 Document: 00512346918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-41202 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ROBERTO RAMIREZ-MATA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-246-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges...
More
Case: 12-41202 Document: 00512346918 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2013
No. 12-41202
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE ROBERTO RAMIREZ-MATA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:12-CR-246-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Roberto Ramirez-Mata
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Newson,
515 F.3d 374, 377-78 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that the Government may
decline to move for an additional one-point reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b)
based on the defendant’s refusal to waive his right to appeal. Accordingly, the
appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.