Filed: Aug. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-51004 Document: 00512333093 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 6, 2013 No. 12-51004 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NOE LOPEZ, also known as Pirri, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-84-10 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: Case: 12-51004 Document: 00512333093 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 6, 2013 No. 12-51004 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NOE LOPEZ, also known as Pirri, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-84-10 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER C..
More
Case: 12-51004 Document: 00512333093 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 6, 2013
No. 12-51004
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
NOE LOPEZ, also known as Pirri,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:12-CR-84-10
Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Noe Lopez has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez has
not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions
of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-51004 Document: 00512333093 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2013
No. 12-51004
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
2