Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Noe Lopez, 12-51004 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-51004 Visitors: 23
Filed: Aug. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-51004 Document: 00512333093 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 6, 2013 No. 12-51004 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. NOE LOPEZ, also known as Pirri, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-84-10 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER
More
     Case: 12-51004       Document: 00512333093         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/06/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                           August 6, 2013
                                     No. 12-51004
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NOE LOPEZ, also known as Pirri,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:12-CR-84-10


Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Noe Lopez has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez has
not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions
of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.                    Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-51004   Document: 00512333093   Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/06/2013

                              No. 12-51004

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.




                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer