Case: 12-60910       Document: 00512438472         Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/12/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                        November 12, 2013
                                     No. 12-60910
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

SOLOMON AYOR,

                                                  Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                                                  Respondent


                        Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                BIA No. A200 239 080


Before KING, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Solomon Ayor, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal
proceedings.
       Ayor’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under
the Convention Against Torture (CAT) were denied because evidence of
persecution was lacking, as the record did not show the government of Nigeria
was unable or unwilling to control Boko Haram, a Muslim extremist group that

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-60910      Document: 00512438472      Page: 2    Date Filed: 11/12/2013

                                   No. 12-60910

allegedly has been targeting him on account of his religion. (Because he did not
file timely a petition for review of the BIA’s underlying decision, Ayor’s eligibility
for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT protection is not at issue. See 8
U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (deadline for review of removal order).)
      In support of his denied motion to reopen, Ayor contends new evidence
establishes the Nigerian government is unwilling or unable to stem the violence
caused by Boko Haram. In that regard, the denial is reviewed for abuse of
discretion; the factual findings, for substantial evidence. Panjwani v. Gonzales,

, 632 (5th Cir. 2005). The BIA is foreclosed from granting motions
to reopen “unless it appears to the [BIA] that evidence sought to be offered is
material and was not available and could not have been discovered or presented
at the former hearing”. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1). The BIA’s denial of such a
motion is upheld “so long as [its decision] is not capricious, racially invidious,
utterly without foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so irrational that it is
arbitrary rather than the result of any perceptible rational approach”. Zhao v.
Gonzales, 

, 304 (5th Cir. 2005) (citation omitted).
      An applicant for asylum must show he is a refugee, i.e., he is unable or
unwilling to return to his native country because of past persecution or a
well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. See, e.g., Dayo v.
Holder, 

, 657 (5th Cir. 2012) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A)).
Persecution refers to harm or mistreatment that rises to a sufficient level of
severity, which was, or will be, inflicted either by a government or by persons “a
government is unable or unwilling to control”, on account of the applicant’s
protected trait. See Tesfamichael v. Gonzales, 

, 113 (5th Cir. 2006).
      According to the State Department Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices for 2011, provided by Ayor in support of his motion to reopen, the
Nigerian government has been actively targeting Boko Haram. Suspected



                                          2
    Case: 12-60910    Document: 00512438472     Page: 3   Date Filed: 11/12/2013

                                 No. 12-60910

members of Boko Haram were arraigned in Nigeria’s Federal High Court for
allegedly detonating bombs during the 2011 presidential elections and for
bombing a political rally and a church. Police detained and killed the father-in-
law of Boko Haram’s then-leader, Muhammed Yusuf, and thereafter killed
Yusuf. State and local governments imposed dusk-to-dawn curfews in response
to ethno-religious violence in the aftermath of Boko Haram attacks. According
to a 2012 United States Commission on International Religious Freedom report,
also provided by Ayor, Boko Haram continues to target and kill Christians,
Muslims, police, and political officials; the government, however, has mobilized
against the threat posed by the group and reportedly made numerous arrests of
suspected Boko Haram members, including a lead suspect in the Christmas 2011
bombings.
      “[H]arassment or violence against [victims of Boko Haram] cannot be
labeled persecution absent some proof that the current . . . government condoned
it or at least demonstrated a complete helplessness to protect the victims”. See
Shehu v. Gonzales, 

, 437 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks
and citation omitted). The Nigerian government has repeatedly responded to
this violence, and the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it ruled that Ayor
failed to establish the Nigerian government was unable or unwilling to combat
Boko Haram.
      Insofar as Ayor claims the BIA erred in affording only minimal weight to
an unauthenticated police record purporting to report the murder of his cousin,
the BIA does not abuse its discretion when it declines to consider
unauthenticated foreign documents. See 8 C.F.R. § 1287.6(b); Qi Hua Li v.
Holder, 354 F. App’x 46, 48 (5th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (unpublished). Ayor’s
contention the Government waived any objection to the authenticity of the
record is meritless, as Ayor bears the burden to show an abuse of discretion. See




                                       3
    Case: 12-60910   Document: 00512438472     Page: 4   Date Filed: 11/12/2013

                                No. 12-60910

Altamirano–Lopez v. Gonzales, 

, 549 (5th Cir. 2006) (“[M]otions to
reopen deportation proceedings are disfavored, and the moving party bears a
heavy burden”.) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
      DENIED.




                                      4