Case: 13-20030       Document: 00512401506         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/09/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          October 9, 2013
                                     No. 13-20030
                                   Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

ISMAEL SOLARES-GARCIA, also known as Ismael Solares Garcia, also known
as Roberto Perez,

                                                  Defendant–Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:12-CR-565-1


Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Ismael Solares-Garcia has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

 (5th Cir. 2011).
Solares-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.


       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-20030      Document: 00512401506   Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/09/2013

                                 No. 13-20030

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2