Filed: Oct. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-30105 Document: 00512414475 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2013 No. 13-30105 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RANDY WILLIAMS, also known as Randy Lafitte, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:07-CR-50053-1 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO,
Summary: Case: 13-30105 Document: 00512414475 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2013 No. 13-30105 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RANDY WILLIAMS, also known as Randy Lafitte, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:07-CR-50053-1 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, ..
More
Case: 13-30105 Document: 00512414475 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 21, 2013
No. 13-30105
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RANDY WILLIAMS, also known as Randy Lafitte,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 5:07-CR-50053-1
Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Randy Williams has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Williams has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-30105 Document: 00512414475 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2013
No. 13-30105
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2