Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-40032 Document: 00512347210 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 13-40032 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARTIN TEJEDA-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1466-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: Case: 13-40032 Document: 00512347210 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 13-40032 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARTIN TEJEDA-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1466-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER ..
More
Case: 13-40032 Document: 00512347210 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2013
No. 13-40032
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARTIN TEJEDA-SILVA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:12-CR-1466-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Martin Tejeda-Silva raises an
argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez,
711 F.3d
541, 559-62 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6, 2013)
(No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded that the generic, contemporary
definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require that the age of consent
be lower than 17 years old and does not include an age-differential requirement.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-40032 Document: 00512347210 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 13-40032
The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2