Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Samuel Castillo-Ramirez, 13-40098 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-40098 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-40098 Document: 00512347328 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 13-40098 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. SAMUEL ADAN CASTILLO-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-547-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Jud
More
     Case: 13-40098       Document: 00512347328         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/20/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 20, 2013
                                     No. 13-40098
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SAMUEL ADAN CASTILLO-RAMIREZ,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 5:12-CR-547-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Samuel Adan Castillo-Ramirez
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Newson,
515 F.3d 374
, 378-79 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that the Government may
decline to move for an additional one-point reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b)
based on the defendant’s refusal to waive his right to appeal. The appellant’s
motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer