Filed: Oct. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-40228 Document: 00512419483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 13-40228 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ANGEL FLORES-DIAZ, also known as Jose Angel Diaz-Flores, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-919-1 Before JOLLY, JONE
Summary: Case: 13-40228 Document: 00512419483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 13-40228 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ANGEL FLORES-DIAZ, also known as Jose Angel Diaz-Flores, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-919-1 Before JOLLY, JONES..
More
Case: 13-40228 Document: 00512419483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2013
No. 13-40228
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE ANGEL FLORES-DIAZ, also known as Jose Angel Diaz-Flores,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:12-CR-919-1
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Angel Flores-Diaz raises
an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez,
711
F.3d 541, 562 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6,
2013) (No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded that the generic,
contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require that the
age of consent be lower than 17 years old and does not include an age-differential
requirement. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED,
and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.