Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Juan Dominguez-Navarro, 13-40571 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-40571 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-40571 Document: 00512419931 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 13-40571 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN ANGEL DOMINGUEZ-NAVARRO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-1074-1 Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges
More
     Case: 13-40571       Document: 00512419931         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/25/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         October 25, 2013
                                     No. 13-40571
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ANGEL DOMINGUEZ-NAVARRO

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 5:12-CR-1074-1


Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Juan Angel Dominguez-
Navarro raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v.
Rodriguez, 
711 F.3d 541
, 562 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert.
filed (June 6, 2013) (No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded that the
generic, contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not require
that the age of consent be lower than 17 years old and does not include an



       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-40571   Document: 00512419931    Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/25/2013

                               No. 13-40571

age-differential requirement. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition
is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer