Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ethan Book, Jr. v. Robert Mendoza, 12-50468 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-50468 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-50468 Document: 00512509020 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 12-50468 January 22, 2014 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ETHAN BOOK, JR., Plaintiff–Appellant, versus ROBERT MENDOZA; CLINT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, , Defendants–Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CV-481 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT,
More
Case: 12-50468 Document: 00512509020 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 12-50468 January 22, 2014 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ETHAN BOOK, JR., Plaintiff–Appellant, versus ROBERT MENDOZA; CLINT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, , Defendants–Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CV-481 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ethan Book, Jr., pro se, sued a Texas school district and its acting * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 12-50468 Document: 00512509020 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2014 No. 12-50468 interim superintendent. His grievance is essentially that the district should not have allowed his children to attend school there and that his wife should be forced to return the children to Connecticut. In his brief on appeal, Book states that “[t]his lawsuit arises in a situation of a yet unaddressed long-term political cancer in Connecticut state government.” The district court declined Book’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and entered summary judgment for defendants. The court correctly decided that Book had sufficient income and assets to pay the required fees. The court also observed that “Plaintiff’s Civil Rights Complaint consists of a twenty-four page tirade against the Connecticut state government and a recitation of Plain- tiff’s crusade to rein in corruption in that state by filing numerous law suits.” There is no error. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer