Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10758 Document: 00512750609 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-10758 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAIME BARAJAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-250-1 Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Th
Summary: Case: 13-10758 Document: 00512750609 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-10758 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAIME BARAJAS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-250-1 Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The..
More
Case: 13-10758 Document: 00512750609 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-10758
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 29, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JAIME BARAJAS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:12-CR-250-1
Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime Barajas has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Barajas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-10758 Document: 00512750609 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
No. 13-10758
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2