Case: 13-30943      Document: 00512732524         Page: 1    Date Filed: 08/13/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                    No. 13-30943                          August 13, 2014
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
KENDRELLE BROWN,

                                                 Petitioner-Appellant

v.

ROBERT C. TANNER, CCE, Warden,

                                                 Respondent-Appellee


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                             USDC No. 2:12-CV-1411


Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Kendrelle Brown, Louisiana prisoner # 526042, appeals the district
court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, challenging his convictions
and sentences for simple battery and armed robbery.                  The district court
granted Brown a certificate of appealability.
       The timing of Brown’s notice of appeal (NOA) raises a threshold
jurisdictional question that we address sua sponte. See Hernandez v. Thaler,


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-30943     Document: 00512732524     Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/13/2014


                                  No. 13-30943

, 424 & n. 11 (5th Cir. 2011). A habeas proceeding is a civil action,
so the “timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite.” 

Brown had 30 days from the entry of the judgment on July 1, 2013, to
file his NOA, see FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A), so the NOA was due July 31, 2013,
see FED. R. APP. P. 26(a)(1)(A), (B).
      Brown did not file an NOA within the 30-day period.            Instead, on
September 3, 2013, he filed an NOA and a motion for an extension of time to
file his NOA, claiming good cause under Rule 4(a)(5)(A) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure. The problem for Brown, however, is that a Rule 4(a)(5)
motion based on good cause or excusable neglect must be filed within 30 days
of the expiration of the time to file an NOA. FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(i).
Because the period for filing an NOA expired on July 31, the motion for
extension was due August 30. See FED. R. APP. P. 26(a)(1). The September 3
motion was therefore untimely. See, e.g., In re MDL 262, 

, 1078-
79 (5th Cir.1986) (holding that compliance with Rule 4(a)(5) is essential to
appellate jurisdiction).
      Because Brown failed to file a timely NOA, we do not have jurisdiction.
See 

& n. 11; In re MDL 

.
The appeal, accordingly, is DISMISSED for want of appellate jurisdiction.




                                        2