Reginald Lombard v. Langley Productions, 13-30979 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 13-30979
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-30979 Document: 00512558849 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 13-30979 FILED Summary Calendar March 12, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk REGINALD LOMBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant v. LANGLEY PRODUCTIONS; VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:13-CV-4730 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO
Summary: Case: 13-30979 Document: 00512558849 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 13-30979 FILED Summary Calendar March 12, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk REGINALD LOMBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant v. LANGLEY PRODUCTIONS; VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:13-CV-4730 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO,..
More
Case: 13-30979 Document: 00512558849 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 13-30979 FILED Summary Calendar March 12, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk REGINALD LOMBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant v. LANGLEY PRODUCTIONS; VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:13-CV-4730 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The Plaintiff has stated no ground for federal jurisdiction. If he intends his complaint to be defamation, he says nothing about residence or extent of damages required for diversity jurisdiction over a state law claim. It is not case citations he lacks; but he alleges no injury protected by federal law. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
