Case: 13-40519      Document: 00512613422         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/30/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit


                                    No. 13-40519
                                                                               FILED
                                                                           April 30, 2014
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALEJANDRO CONTRERAS-MENESES, also known as Alejandro Contreras-
Ramirez,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 2:12-CR-1035-1


Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Alejandro Contreras-Meneses has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011).      Contreras-Meneses has not filed a response.                    We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-40519    Document: 00512613422     Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/30/2014


                                 No. 13-40519

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2