Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hector Peralta-Mejia, 13-40627 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-40627 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-40627 Document: 00512644598 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-40627 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 28, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. HECTOR RAMON PERALTA-MEJIA, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-2093-1 Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. P
More
     Case: 13-40627       Document: 00512644598         Page: 1     Date Filed: 05/28/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                     No. 13-40627
                                   Summary Calendar
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                                                             May 28, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk
                                                  Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

HECTOR RAMON PERALTA-MEJIA,

                                                  Defendant - Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:12-CR-2093-1


Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Hector Ramon Peralta-Mejia challenges the 41-month prison sentence
imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being found in the United
States after a previous deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (reentry of
removed aliens). He contends the district court erred in assessing a 16-level
crime-of-violence enhancement, based on his prior conviction under New York
Penal Law § 130.25 (rape in the third degree).


       * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-40627    Document: 00512644598     Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/28/2014


                                 No. 13-40627

      The court found all subsections of § 130.25 fit within the generic meaning
of enumerated offenses listed in the definition of “crime of violence” under
Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2 (unlawfully entering or remaining in the United
States). Peralta contends there was insufficient evidence to determine under
which section he was convicted, and that this court must vacate his sentence
if any subsection of § 130.25 does not qualify as a crime of violence. Along that
line, Peralta asserts § 130.25(2), sexual intercourse with a person under 17,
involves the least culpable conduct, and does not qualify.
      Regarding § 130.25(2), this court has held previously, in unpublished
opinions, that the offense constitutes a crime of violence under Guideline
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). United States v. Guzman-Saldivar, 262 F. App’x 594, 594
(5th Cir. 2008); United States v. Gonzalez-Alonzo, 204 F. App’x 359, 360 (5th
Cir. 2006).   In the light of these opinions, it is unavailing for Peralta to
challenge the court’s finding as to subsection two. As Peralta concedes in the
light of our following controlling precedent, it is also unavailing for him to
contend the age of consent is 16 for purposes of the generic, contemporary
meanings of sexual abuse of a minor and statutory rape. United States v.
Rodriguez, 
711 F.3d 541
, 548, 562 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 
134 S. Ct. 512
(2013) (recognizing this court uses age of consent as defined by state
statute). He presents the issue to preserve it for possible further review.
      AFFIRMED.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer