Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Geiman Reyes, 13-40724 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-40724 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-40724 Document: 00512539607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 21, 2014 No. 13-40724 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GEIMAN REYES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-1019-1 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
More
     Case: 13-40724       Document: 00512539607          Page: 1     Date Filed: 02/21/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                                                          February 21, 2014
                                     No. 13-40724
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GEIMAN REYES,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:12-CR-1019-1


Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Geiman Reyes raises an
argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 
586 F.3d 303
, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and
quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841.                          The
appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.




       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer