Filed: Feb. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-40724 Document: 00512539607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 21, 2014 No. 13-40724 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GEIMAN REYES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-1019-1 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: Case: 13-40724 Document: 00512539607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 21, 2014 No. 13-40724 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GEIMAN REYES, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-1019-1 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*..
More
Case: 13-40724 Document: 00512539607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 21, 2014
No. 13-40724
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
GEIMAN REYES,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:12-CR-1019-1
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Geiman Reyes raises an
argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586
F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and
quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The
appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.