Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-41305 Document: 00512750893 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-41305 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEONARDO MUNIZ-FIGUEROA, also known as Leonardo Muniz, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13-CR-246-1 Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and
Summary: Case: 13-41305 Document: 00512750893 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-41305 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEONARDO MUNIZ-FIGUEROA, also known as Leonardo Muniz, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13-CR-246-1 Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ..
More
Case: 13-41305 Document: 00512750893 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-41305
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 29, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LEONARDO MUNIZ-FIGUEROA, also known as Leonardo Muniz,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:13-CR-246-1
Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Leonardo Muniz-Figueroa
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v.
Rodriguez-Escareno,
700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S.
Ct. 2044 (2013), which held that the sentence enhancement provided for in
U.S.S.G. ยง 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) applies to a conviction for the federal crime of
conspiracy to commit a federal drug trafficking offense. The unopposed motion
for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court
is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.