Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-41354 Document: 00512751075 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-41354 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. MANUEL ENRIQUE PEREZ-VILLARREAL, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-11-1 Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 13-41354 Document: 00512751075 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-41354 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. MANUEL ENRIQUE PEREZ-VILLARREAL, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-11-1 Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. ..
More
Case: 13-41354 Document: 00512751075 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-41354
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 29, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MANUEL ENRIQUE PEREZ-VILLARREAL,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:13-CR-11-1
Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Manuel Enrique Perez-
Villarreal (Perez) raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United
States v. Betancourt,
586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that
knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21
U.S.C. § 841. Accordingly, Perez’s unopposed motion for summary disposition
is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.