Filed: Nov. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-40210 Document: 00512825427 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-40210 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 4, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE LUIS KNIGHT-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-772-1 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges
Summary: Case: 14-40210 Document: 00512825427 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-40210 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 4, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORGE LUIS KNIGHT-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-772-1 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges...
More
Case: 14-40210 Document: 00512825427 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-40210
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 4, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JORGE LUIS KNIGHT-CASTILLO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:13-CR-772-1
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jorge Luis Knight-Castillo
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v.
Betancourt,
586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge
of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C.
§ 841. Accordingly, Knight-Castillo’s unopposed motion for summary
disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.