Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Juan Giron-Guerrero, 14-40233 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 14-40233 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-40233 Document: 00512879303 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/22/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-40233 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 22, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN GIRON-GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-786-1 Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CU
More
     Case: 14-40233      Document: 00512879303         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/22/2014




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 14-40233
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                        December 22, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN GIRON-GUERRERO,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:13-CR-786-1


Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Juan Giron-Guerrero (Giron) pleaded guilty to being found unlawfully
present in the United States following a prior deportation that was subsequent
to a conviction for an aggravated felony, and he was sentenced to 36 months of
imprisonment. Giron appeals the district court’s determination that his prior
Texas conviction for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance
qualified as a drug trafficking offense warranting a 16-level enhancement


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-40233     Document: 00512879303      Page: 2    Date Filed: 12/22/2014


                                  No. 14-40233

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i). He argues that the Texas statute
criminalizes the “administering” of drugs, which is not covered by the
Guideline. Because Giron preserved this argument in the district court, our
review is de novo. See United States v. Rodriguez, 
711 F.3d 541
, 548 (5th Cir.)
(en banc), cert. denied, 
134 S. Ct. 512
(2013).
       Giron has failed to show that there is a realistic possibility that a person
either would be prosecuted for “administering” methamphetamine as that
term    is   defined   under   the   Texas    statute   or   could    “administer”
methamphetamine in a manner that did not also constitute “dispensing” or
“distributing” under the Guidelines. See United States v. Teran-Salas, 
767 F.3d 453
, 460-62 (5th Cir. 2014). Moreover, he has identified no prior Texas
case applying the statute in an “administering” situation. See 
id. at 460-61.
A
theoretical possibility that a statute might encompass types of conduct that
would not qualify as a drug trafficking offense is insufficient. See United States
v. Carrasco-Tercero, 
745 F.3d 192
, 197-98 (5th Cir. 2014).
       Thus, the district court was correct in determining that Giron’s
conviction was a drug trafficking offense for purposes of the § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i)
enhancement. See 
Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d at 461-62
& n.5. Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer