Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Innocent Batamula, 12-20630 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-20630 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-20630 Document: 00513260459 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/05/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-20630 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee v. INNOCENT RUTAHAGARA BATAMULA, Defendant Appellant _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston _ (Opinion June 2, 2015, 5 Cir., 2015, 788 F.3d 166 ) Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAY
More
     Case: 12-20630    Document: 00513260459     Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/05/2015




        IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                             _____________________

                                 No. 12-20630
                             _____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                           Plaintiff  Appellee

v.

INNOCENT RUTAHAGARA BATAMULA,

                                                           Defendant  Appellant
                          __________________________

             Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                    Southern District of Texas, Houston
                        __________________________

                (Opinion June 2, 2015, 5 Cir., 2015, 
788 F.3d 166
)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS,
CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES,
HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

      A majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not
disqualified having voted in favor, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this
case en banc,
      IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc
with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a
briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer