Filed: Dec. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10899 Document: 00513314569 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2015 No. 13-10899 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk BEATRICE LUNA, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Israel Leija, Jr.; CHRISTINA MARIE FLORES, as Next Friend of J.L. and J.L., Minor Children, Plaintiffs - Appellees v. CHADRIN LEE MULLENIX, In His Individual Capacity, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from t
Summary: Case: 13-10899 Document: 00513314569 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2015 No. 13-10899 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk BEATRICE LUNA, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Israel Leija, Jr.; CHRISTINA MARIE FLORES, as Next Friend of J.L. and J.L., Minor Children, Plaintiffs - Appellees v. CHADRIN LEE MULLENIX, In His Individual Capacity, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from th..
More
Case: 13-10899 Document: 00513314569 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/18/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 18, 2015
No. 13-10899 Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
BEATRICE LUNA, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Israel
Leija, Jr.; CHRISTINA MARIE FLORES, as Next Friend of J.L. and J.L.,
Minor Children,
Plaintiffs - Appellees
v.
CHADRIN LEE MULLENIX, In His Individual Capacity,
Defendant - Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:12-CV-152
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before KING, HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This case returns to us from the Supreme Court, No. 14-1143, Mullenix
v. Luna, following the Court’s grant of certiorari to consider our affirmance of
the district court’s judgment. Luna v. Mullenix,
773 F.3d 712 (5th Cir. 2014).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-10899 Document: 00513314569 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/18/2015
No. 13-10899
The Supreme Court reversed our judgment. Accordingly, we now REVERSE
the district court’s judgment for the reasons outlined in the Supreme Court’s
opinion and RENDER judgment in favor of Mullenix.
2