Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mary Viegelahn v. Charles Harris, III, 13-50374 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-50374 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-50374 Document: 00513092011 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-50374 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED In the Matter of: CHARLES E. HARRIS, III, June 24, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Debtor Clerk - MARY K. VIEGELAHN, Chapter 13 Trustee Appellant v. CHARLES E. HARRIS, III, Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CV-540 ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
More
Case: 13-50374 Document: 00513092011 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/24/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-50374 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED In the Matter of: CHARLES E. HARRIS, III, June 24, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Debtor Clerk ------------------------------ MARY K. VIEGELAHN, Chapter 13 Trustee Appellant v. CHARLES E. HARRIS, III, Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CV-540 ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* *Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-50374 Document: 00513092011 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/24/2015 No. 13-50374 This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court, No. 14-400, Harris v. Viegelahn, Chapter 13 Trustee, following the Court’s grant of certiorari to consider our reversal of the district court’s judgment. The Supreme Court reversed our judgment and remanded this case to us for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Accordingly, we now AFFIRM the district court’s judgment for the reasons outlined in the Supreme Court’s opinion. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer