Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hector Garza-Mata v. USA, 14-41158 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 14-41158 Visitors: 48
Filed: Mar. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-41158 Document: 00512976163 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 20, 2015 No. 14-41158 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk HECTOR R. GARZA-MATA, Pro Se & Siblings similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as head of the Department
More
Case: 14-41158 Document: 00512976163 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 20, 2015 No. 14-41158 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk HECTOR R. GARZA-MATA, Pro Se & Siblings similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, in his official capacity as head of the Department of Justice; DAVID L. NEAL, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals; JOHN KERRY, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; RON ROSENBERG, Chief of the Administrative Appeals Office - U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; ALBERT W. BLAKEWAY, Field Office Director - U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services - San Antonio, Texas, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14-CV-48 Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. Case: 14-41158 Document: 00512976163 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 No. 14-41158 PER CURIAM:* The lengthy complaint filed by the Plaintiff lists what is thought to have been official mistakes affecting his grandmother and other family members in past years. But no claim that warrants legal relief now by a federal court is set forth. As for the claim of citizenship, the district court has correctly explained why that must fail. The court also explained why the other civil and constitutional rights discussed by the Plaintiff state no legal complaint against any defendant. The case must be dismissed. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer