Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Dayna Velasquez, 14-41171 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 14-41171 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-41171 Document: 00513079574 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-41171 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. DAYNA ALEXA VELASQUEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14-CR-266-1 Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
More
     Case: 14-41171      Document: 00513079574         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/16/2015




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 14-41171
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                            June 16, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAYNA ALEXA VELASQUEZ

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:14-CR-266-1


Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Dayna Alexa Velasquez
raises an argument that she concedes is foreclosed by United States v.
Betancourt, 
586 F.3d 303
, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge
of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 offense. The
unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer