Filed: Aug. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-51272 Document: 00513162512 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-51272 United States Court of Appeals Summary Calendar Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2015 SHIRLEY KLEIN, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; AMERIPRO FUNDING, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation, doing business as Land Mortgage; BUCKLEY MADOLA, P.C., Defendants – Appellees. Ap
Summary: Case: 14-51272 Document: 00513162512 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-51272 United States Court of Appeals Summary Calendar Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2015 SHIRLEY KLEIN, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; AMERIPRO FUNDING, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation, doing business as Land Mortgage; BUCKLEY MADOLA, P.C., Defendants – Appellees. App..
More
Case: 14-51272 Document: 00513162512 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-51272 United States Court of Appeals Summary Calendar Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2015 SHIRLEY KLEIN, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; AMERIPRO FUNDING, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation, doing business as Land Mortgage; BUCKLEY MADOLA, P.C., Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:14-CV-861 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellant, Shirley Klein, proceeding pro se, argues that the district court erred in determining that two defendants were fraudulently joined and in failing to remand the case to state court. We have studied the record and * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. Case: 14-51272 Document: 00513162512 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2015 No. 14-51272 briefs, and reviewed the district court’s thorough opinion. For essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM. 2
