Filed: Feb. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10186 Document: 00513383094 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-10186 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ERNESTO VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13-CR-411-4 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Summary: Case: 15-10186 Document: 00513383094 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-10186 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 17, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. ERNESTO VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:13-CR-411-4 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * T..
More
Case: 15-10186 Document: 00513383094 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-10186
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 17, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ERNESTO VASQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:13-CR-411-4
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Ernesto Vasquez has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-10186 Document: 00513383094 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-10186
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2