Case: 15-10201      Document: 00513337378         Page: 1    Date Filed: 01/11/2016




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 15-10201
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                                                FILED
                                                                         January 11, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                                           Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk
                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL RAFAEL SANDOVAL-MATA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:14-CR-95-1


Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Rafael
Sandoval-Mata has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Sandoval-Mata has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 15-10201    Document: 00513337378    Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/11/2016


                                No. 15-10201

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2