Filed: May 31, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10623 Document: 00513526972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2016 REVISED MAY 31, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 15-10623 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar May 27, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JEFFREY HEATHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14-CR-367-29 Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Ju
Summary: Case: 15-10623 Document: 00513526972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2016 REVISED MAY 31, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 15-10623 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar May 27, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JEFFREY HEATHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14-CR-367-29 Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Jud..
More
Case: 15-10623 Document: 00513526972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2016
REVISED MAY 31, 2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
No. 15-10623
Fifth Circuit
FILED
Summary Calendar May 27, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JEFFREY HEATHINGTON,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:14-CR-367-29
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Jeffrey Heathington has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Heathington has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-10623 Document: 00513526972 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2016
No. 15-10623
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2