Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10698 Document: 00513728261 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-10698 FILED Summary Calendar October 21, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENNETH ETTER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14-CR-367-22 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Th
Summary: Case: 15-10698 Document: 00513728261 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 15-10698 FILED Summary Calendar October 21, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KENNETH ETTER, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14-CR-367-22 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The..
More
Case: 15-10698 Document: 00513728261 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 15-10698 FILED
Summary Calendar October 21, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
KENNETH ETTER,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:14-CR-367-22
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Kenneth Etter has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Etter has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-10698 Document: 00513728261 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2016
No. 15-10698
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2