Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-11160 Document: 00513556925 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-11160 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOANNA ESPINOZA REYNA, also known as Joanna Reyna Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:11-CR-56-1 Before JONES, CLEMENT, a
Summary: Case: 15-11160 Document: 00513556925 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-11160 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOANNA ESPINOZA REYNA, also known as Joanna Reyna Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:11-CR-56-1 Before JONES, CLEMENT, an..
More
Case: 15-11160 Document: 00513556925 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-11160
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 21, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOANNA ESPINOZA REYNA, also known as Joanna Reyna Espinoza,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:11-CR-56-1
Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Joanna Espinoza Reyna
raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Shabazz,
633 F.3d
342, 345-46 (5th Cir. 2011), which held that the phrase “on any such
revocation” in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) does not impose an aggregate limit on
imprisonment for revocation of supervised release but limits only the amount
of imprisonment that may be imposed each time a court revokes a defendant’s
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 15-11160 Document: 00513556925 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
No. 15-11160
supervised release. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is
DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
2