Filed: Sep. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-30888 Document: 00513674745 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 12, 2016 No. 15-30888 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk BOLLINGER MARINE FABRICATORS, L.L.C.; BOLLINGER SHIPYARDS LOCKPORT, L.L.C., Plaintiffs - Appellees Cross-Appellants v. MARINE TRAVELIFT, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisia
Summary: Case: 15-30888 Document: 00513674745 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 12, 2016 No. 15-30888 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk BOLLINGER MARINE FABRICATORS, L.L.C.; BOLLINGER SHIPYARDS LOCKPORT, L.L.C., Plaintiffs - Appellees Cross-Appellants v. MARINE TRAVELIFT, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisian..
More
Case: 15-30888 Document: 00513674745 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 12, 2016 No. 15-30888 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk BOLLINGER MARINE FABRICATORS, L.L.C.; BOLLINGER SHIPYARDS LOCKPORT, L.L.C., Plaintiffs - Appellees Cross-Appellants v. MARINE TRAVELIFT, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:14-CV-1743 Before JONES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral argument, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no error of law or reversible error of fact. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that court. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
