Case: 16-40349      Document: 00513725658         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/19/2016




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                 Fifth Circuit


                                    No. 16-40349
                                                                               FILED
                                                                        October 19, 2016
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                          Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                               Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ABRAHAM HERNANDEZ-ZAVALA,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:16-CR-35-1


Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Abraham
Hernandez-Zavala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 

 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 

 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Zavala has filed a response.
The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of
Hernandez-Zavala’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-40349    Document: 00513725658     Page: 2      Date Filed: 10/19/2016


                                 No. 16-40349

decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review.          See
United States v. Isgar, 

, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
      We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein, as well as Hernandez-Zavala’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2