Filed: Nov. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-40643 Document: 00513752600 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-40643 FILED Summary Calendar November 9, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROLANDO CERVANTES-CASTILLO, also known as Rolando Garcia- Castillo, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15-CR-1776-1 Before JONES,
Summary: Case: 16-40643 Document: 00513752600 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-40643 FILED Summary Calendar November 9, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ROLANDO CERVANTES-CASTILLO, also known as Rolando Garcia- Castillo, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15-CR-1776-1 Before JONES, W..
More
Case: 16-40643 Document: 00513752600 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 16-40643 FILED
Summary Calendar November 9, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ROLANDO CERVANTES-CASTILLO, also known as Rolando Garcia-
Castillo,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:15-CR-1776-1
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rolando Cervantes-
Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cervantes-Castillo has not filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 16-40643 Document: 00513752600 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/09/2016
No. 16-40643
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2