Case: 16-20612      Document: 00514074628         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/17/2017




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                    No. 16-20612                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                            July 17, 2017
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NAHUN HUBERTO ALMENDAREZ-VILLAFRANCA, also known as Nahun
Almendarez, also known as Nahun Huberto Almendarez Villafranca,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:16-CR-165-1


Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nahun Huberto
Almendarez-Villafranca has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States
v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Almendarez-Villafranca has not filed a
response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 16-20612   Document: 00514074628    Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/17/2017


                               No. 16-20612

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                     2